Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00699
Original file (PD2013 00699.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD1300699
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140701
DATE OF PLACEMENT ON TDRL: 20030401
FINAL SEPARATION DATE: 20040616


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (27T/Avenger System Repairer) medically separated for vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) syndrome. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent P3S3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The VCD syndrome was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also forwarded Axis 1 adjustment disorder with mixed disturbances in mood and anxiety as disqualifying. The PEB determined the VCD syndrome condition was unfitting and not sufficiently stable for final adjudication, and placed the CI on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 1 April 2003 with a rating of 30%, with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB determined the adjustment disorder was not unfitting and not ratable. After reevaluation on 26 February 2004 the PEB adjudicated the VCD as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI non-concurred and forwarded a written rebuttal to the PEB. After consideration, the PEB found that no change was warranted. The findings were affirmed by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency and the CI was permanently separated.


CI CONTENTION: “VA rated veteran at 90% disabled and 100% unemployable due to service related disability.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB, when specifically requested by the applicant. The ratings for conditions meeting the above criteria are addressed below. In addition, the Secretary of Defense directed a comprehensive review of Service members with certain mental health conditions referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 that were changed or eliminated during that process. The applicant was notified that he may meet the inclusion criteria of the Mental Health Review Terms of Reference. The mental health condition was reviewed regarding diagnosis change, fitness determination and rating in accordance with VASRD §4.129 and §4.130. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, may be eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Final Service PEB - 20040421
 VA (7 Mo. Prior to Final Adjudication*) - Effective 20040421
On TDRL - 20040401
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Condition
 TDRL Sep.
Vocal Cord Dysfunction Syndrome 6599 6520 30% 10% Vocal Cord Dysfunction Syndrome 8299 8210 0% 20030924
Healed Granuloma, Right Lung with Bilateral Hilar Calcifications and Rhinitis 6699 6602 30% 20030924
Adjustment D/O with Mixed Disturbances in Mood and Anxiety Not Unfitting Adjustment D/O with Mixed Anxiety D/O and Depressed Mood D/O 9499 9413 10% 20030924
No Other Conditions in Scope
 Other X 1
Rated: 30% → 10%
 Combined: 40%
* Reflects VA rating exam proximate to TDRL removal and adjudication date was based on final PEB . Included are both VCD and Healed Granuloma because both were used for rating the CI’s contended condition.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Vocal Cord Dysfunction (VCD). The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI developed shortness of breath (SOB), light headedness and cardiac palpitations with anxiety during strenuous activity in 1997 with increase in symptoms in 2000. Cardiac disease and primary asthma were ruled out as etiologies by appropriate diagnostic studies. Routine chest X-ray performed in February 2001 revealed a questionable mass in the right mid and lower lung fields as a possible source of the symptoms. CT scan of the chest performed on 20 March 2001, revealed small benign masses in the mid and upper right lung fields felt to be old lymph nodes or granulomas (evidence of old infections). A full medical workup for any active disease process, to include tuberculosis, fungus, sarcoidosis, pneumonitis and malignancy was negative. Subsequent CT scans in October 2001 and August 2002 were unchanged. Direct laryngoscopy of the throat performed on 27 February 2001, revealed dysfunction of the vocal cords during deep expiration and a diagnosis of VCD was rendered. The CI was treated with speech and home rehabilitation therapy. At a family practice evaluation on 19 February 2002, the CI was noted to be “not motivated to get better,” and reluctant to do his own home rehabilitation. The CI was scheduled for a repeat direct laryngoscopy for the MEB process at the University of South Carolina in September 2002, but was non-attendant for the appointment. At the MEB NARSUM evaluation on 11 November 2002, a month prior to placement on the TDRL, the CI reported his attacks to be increasing in frequency and intensity and to occur primarily after physical exertion. The MEB physical exam noted the CI to be in no distress. Examination of the neck, heart and lungs was normal. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) for the MEB on 9 December 2002, revealed an FEV-1 of 65%, FVC of 71% and FEV-1/FVC of 76 % all post-bronchodilator. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) general exam performed on 24 September 2003, 9 months prior to final separation, the CI reported his attacks to occur approximately every other week but “not regularly.” On physical exam, voice, airway and neck exams were normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the condition 6520, larynx, stenosis, IAW §4.97; determined the condition to be unstable, and placed the CI on TDRL at 30%, citing an FEV-1 on PFT of 65%. Under this code a rating of 30% requires an FEV-1 of 56% to 71%. A higher rating of 60% requires FEV-1 of 40% to 55%. The VA rated the VCD syndrome 0%, coded 8210, paralysis of the vagus nerve (the nerve enervating the vocal cords) IAW §4.124 citing no demonstrated evidence of vocal cord paralysis on examination. The Board noted the VA to rate the symptoms of SOB, thought related to the VCD at 30%, coded 6602, asthma, IAW §4.97 citing FEV-1 of 63%.

The Board first undertook to determine if a rating higher than 30% was indicated at the time of TDRL placement. The Board unanimously agreed that the record in evidence supported no rating higher than 30% for the VCD condition based on PFT and found no other appropriate codes for rating consideration. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the VCD condition at TDRL entry. The examination for TDRL removal was undertaken on 26 February 2004. On this exam, the CI reported no hospitalizations for the condition, attacks of SOB twice weekly with three to four emergency department visits over the last year. He noted working up until 2 weeks prior, but had been terminated for frequent medical absences. He reported his symptoms to remain unchanged the past year, but had been receiving no definitive treatment. The CI was able to perform activities of daily living but had difficulty with any type of strenuous exercise. He articulated his intent to reengage with VA vocational rehabilitation. On examination, heart, lungs and throat were normal. PFT at this time revealed an FEV-1 of 77% and an FEV-1/FVC of 102%. The Board noted one emergency department visit for treatment of the VCD condition in the 12-month period prior to this examination, that occurring approximately 3 months prior.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB permanently rated the VCD condition 10% coded 6520 citing FEV-1 of 77% on PFT. The Board unanimously agreed that the record in evidence supported a rating of 10% under this code. The Board was unable to find any other applicable codes for rating consideration. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the VCD condition at TDRL removal. Therefore, the Board recommends no change in the PEB’s adjudication for the unfitting VCD condition at TDRL entry or removal.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that the adjustment disorder condition was not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. According to the psychiatry addendum for the MEB on 25 September 2002, the CI had been treated earlier in his military career with good results for mood and anxiety symptoms, allowing a deployment in 2002. During deployment the VCD condition worsened with resultant reappearance of his MH symptoms. At the time of this evaluation, the CI was experiencing sad mood and constant worry which related to his health problems, worry about separation from the military, his ability to take care of his family, and future occupation. He denied anxiety before the VCD attacks. On mental status exam, the CI was oriented, calm and cooperative without evidence of psychosis, panic attacks, suicidal or homicidal ideation, hallucinations or delusions. The examiner rendered an Axis 1 diagnosis of adjustment disorder with mixed disturbances in mood and anxiety and assigned a Global Assessment of Function of 70 (some mild symptoms OR some difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning, but generally functioning pretty well, has some meaningful interpersonal relationships). This diagnosis was confirmed by the VA C&P Mental Disorders exam on 24 September 2003.

The Board unanimously agreed that the VCD was the source of the MH symptoms and that diagnosis of adjustment disorder was supported by the preponderance of evidence in record. The Board found no DSM-IV evidence to support a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder. There was no performance based evidence from the record that any primary MH condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. The Board agreed that no MH condition was unfitting and that §4.130 and §4.129 were not applicable. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the any MH condition and therefore no additional disability rating is recommended. The Board agreed that this applicant did not appear to meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Projects as no MH diagnosis was changed during the DES process.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the VCD condition and IAW VASRD §4.97, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended adjustment disorder condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determination as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130529, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20140018682 (PD201300699)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00285

    Original file (PD2012-00285.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On final PEB evaluation, 62 months later, the PEB adjudicated the vocal cord dysfunction and right lower extremity complex regional pain syndrome as unfitting, rated at 0% and 10% respectively, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. TDRL RATING COMPARISON: Service PEB Admin Correction – Dated 20050616 Rating Condition Code Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Right Lower Extremity Vocal...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00941

    Original file (PD2011-00941.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The initial narrative summary (NARSUM) and PEB considered the CI unfitting for asthma compounded by vocal cord dysfunction and rated the CI under (analogously to) the asthma coding criteria...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01773

    Original file (PD2012 01773.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the VCD, and IAW VASRD §4.97, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00890

    Original file (PD 2012 00890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA’s analogous asthma rating of 30% was based on “daily use of Singulair and Albuterol” and a diagnosis of asthma a year prior to separation. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Vocal Cord Dysfunction 6599-6520 0% COMBINED 0% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120619, w/atchs Exhibit B. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01210

    Original file (PD2012 01210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated asthma with VCDand chronic pain left knee conditions as unfitting, rated 30% and 0% respectively,referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. 660230%10%Asthma with Vocal Cord Dysfunction660230%20020606Chronic Pain, Left Knee In addition, the CI had a VCD that significantly responded to the beta-agonist inhalational medication, Albuterol for which the medication profile in evidence reflects dosing...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02803

    Original file (PD-2013-02803.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01089

    Original file (PD2010-01089.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, speech pathology commented that “stress related to adjustment to military life and depression related to being away from his family…appear to be significant contributing factors.” Psychiatry recommended concomitant treatment with SSRIs for management of the related depression and anxiety symptoms, with occasional short term use of benzodiazepines for acute exacerbations of his vocal cord dysfunction. The Board considered all of the evidence, and concluded that the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02765

    Original file (PD-2013-02765.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The requested sleep apnea, anxiety, hypertension and rhinitis conditions were not identified by the PEB, and therefore not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Asthma Condition . The PEB TDRL exit rating was 10%,with the disability description stating: “not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 02351

    Original file (PD2013 02351.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20060629 The CI is also eligible for PDBR review of other conditions evaluated by the PEB and has elected review by the PDBR.The ratings for the unfitting asthma and anxiety conditions are addressed below and no other conditions meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00374

    Original file (PD-2012-00374.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. At TDRL entry, the PEB adjudicated the CI’s asthma condition using VASRD code 6602, Asthma, and rated it 30% based on daily medication use. Although the TDRL re‐evaluation exam 6 months prior to separation documented daily Advair use, the PEB’s proceedings document suggested they required a medication profile be submitted as proof of medication use required to meet the 30% rating threshold.